This is a followup to my post last week. I just checked and I moved up in the NCAA
rankings. I guessed half of the teams in the final 4 correctly. Next week I guess
I will finally find out if I was lucky or one of the teams I didn't pick wins.
On the OOXML front things are looking up as well. According to the article at http://www.itnews.com.au/News/72970,the-votes-are-in-on-ooxml.aspx the
results of the vote are not yet public but an informal poling shows that OOXML will
pass. I have been really busy and haven't had time to digest all the feedback but
there are numerous articles and e-mails floating around about how Microsoft or someone
opposed to OOXML strong armed someone into voting one way or another. I wasn't there
and with a few exceptions don't know the people personally so I don't know
how reliable the accounts are and how much of what they are reporting comes from
their own personal bias. I have to say that is disappointing but not that unexpected.
All anyone has to do is look at the political process here to see examples of name
calling, mud slinging, and down right lies used to make one person look better than
another. I suppose that each side in this discussion/debate is passionate enough to
resort to those same means to get what they want.
In the end the idealist in me would like to see everyone be able to decide on a single
specification but the pragmatist says "if you ask 10 people their opinion on a topic
you will get 12 different opinions" so we will not be likely to see any single specification
satisfy everyone. For now it looks like we will have an official specification to
work from and to make changes to as they are discovered and voted on through the change
procedure.